Draga kolegice Potočnik,
hvala što ste stavili novu temu na Connect i linkove na navedene radove. Nadam se da će se razviti žustra rasprava.
Baš sam jučer htjela postaviti upit kolegama s Connecta, a sad ću iskoristiti Vašu temu pa uključiti svoje pirtanje.
Kolege i kolegice Connect-ovci,
postoji li u hrvatskom znanstvenom sustavu jasan kriterij za izbor čovjeka na radno mjesto znanstvenog novaka ili na suradničko radno mjesto asistenta?
Vrlo konkretno: jesu li, osim kriterija prosjeka ocjena na dodiplomskom studiju (ili preporuka), propisani zakonima/pravilnicima i drugi kriteriji koji određuju da se na takvo radno mjesto zapošljava osoba po kriterijima izvrsnosti?
Još konkretnije: može li fakultet kao pravna osoba, zaposliti nekog koji je u dobi od 40 i više godina na radno mjesto asistenta a tko nikad do tada nije imao nikakve veze sa znanosti?
|
|
| Ovo pitanje je tema za sebe pa molim #1 da otvori novu post sa tom temom, a ostale da u ovoj temi ignoriraju pitanje u #1 i drze se teme iz #0 |
|
Primila na znanje.
Otvaram novu temu.
Zanemarite post #1. |
|
Šteta bi bilo da zanimljivi članci ostanu bez odjeka. Zato ću ovdje citirati neke pasuse:
Članak o znanstvenoj produkciji HR sveučilišta (analiza sveučilišta u Zagrebu, Rijeci, Splitu i Osijeku, bez Zadra i Dubrovnika koji imaju preniske znanstvene rezultate) iz kojeg ću navesti samo sažetak:
We compared the Croatian research output with the neighboring countries and the Croatian
universities with the largest Slovenian, Hungarian, and Serbian universities. As far as papers listed by
Social Science Citation Index are concerned, since 2000 the University of Zagreb exhibits best results
in social sciences compared to the competing universities, that is not the case in “hard” sciences. For
the last 12 years, only the University of Ljubljana has shown better results in total research output
than the University of Zagreb. The difference in research output between the University of Zagreb and
the rest of the Croatian universities has been constantly decreasing. As a case study we compare
research output at Faculty of Civil Engeenering on different Croatian universities. By analyzing
European countries, we show a functional dependence between the gross domestic product (GDP) and
the research output. From this fit we conclude
expected for the given level of GDP.
Članak o Connect Portalu donosi analizu iz koje ću navesti više točaka:
Općeniti prikaz doprinosa Portala
The main achievements of “Connect” have so far been related to democratisation of the
Croatian scientific public sphere. Approximately 2500 discussion threads have been opened
at the community’s portal. As one member observed, “Connect”, and particularly public
discussions at its portal, contributed to bringing many important issues related to science in
Croatia from backdoors to public sight [30]. In doing this, “Connect” both provided help to
and received help from other media through a kind of mutually reinforcing feedback loop. In
one direction, portal discussions have often served as sources of interesting and fresh topics
for media coverage, and in the other direction, extensive media coverage has helped the
community to attract attention of prospective new members.
Opis načina i tona komunikacije
Unfortunately, discussions at the community’s portal occasionally get also so highly charged
with emotions that civil debate becomes close to impossible. Contrasting opinions and
opposing arguments then give way to angry disputes and flame wars. Examples of deliberate
flaming include direct exchanges of insults; attacks ad hominem; using titles, official and
other positions of authority to impress or even threaten members with different opinions;
using authoritative or patronising tone and various other methods of disparaging discussion of participants with different opinions. Various sorts of insinuations and intentional biased
portrayal of individuals, groups, events, and situations, known as spins, have also been
used as weapons of flame wars.
Although these flame wars are not as frequent and intensive as in many other non-scientific
forums, their consequences are still destructive to the community’s commons. Focus of such
heated discussions gradually shifts from the original issues to the trading of insults. Some
participants, who find themselves hurt, tend to retreat from the community, while others tend
to continue disputes indefinitely, sometimes even through other media. Although this may not
be true in general, personal experience of the authors tells that the incidence of flame wars
discourages prospective members from entering the community and current members from
entering discussions. Fortunately, excesses more serious than occasional flame wars have not
been noticed so far.
Prijedlozi za poboljšanje komunikacije među članovima
Conflict resolution mechanisms have not been implemented. One of the reasons probably lies
in the lack of adequate technical prerequisites. It remains a challenge for social computing
practitioners to develop low-cost e-versions of various conflict resolution procedures such as
negotiation, mediation, conciliation, adjudication, arbitration, etc.
null |
|
iz prvog clanka: "Even though the University of Zagreb published more papers than the Eötvös Loránd University and the University of Szeged, for each of the last three years, the two Hungarian universities were placed on the list of 500 most prestigeous universities."
Zakljucak: kolicina nije bitna - a di je kvaliteta?
iz drugog clanka: "The community gatherings like “Connect::Party” provide a way to compensate for the lack of trust that anonymous ratings may accidentally instil in some members. ... Referring to the three kinds of collective goods provided by virtual communities, we may say that face-to-face meetings facilitate transformation of social network capital into communion."
Pitanje: Zasto su feste prestale? |
|
Edukacija
Connect::Portal::Gosti
2008.11.19. 22:27h CET